Skip to content
Evidence record · published sample reports

Mdrn-Life DDW Laboratory Sample Results

Mdrn-Life publishes available laboratory documents so customers, researchers and practitioners can inspect the evidence behind specific tested samples. Each document should be read according to its sample identification, method, reporting unit and stated uncertainty.

These are sample-specific results. They are not presented as evidence that every Mdrn-Life bottle or every production batch has undergone the same external testing.

Original laboratory documents

Two reports, preserved in the units each laboratory supplied

Hydroisotop GmbH

Sample Mdrn-Life DDW 0006

−980.5‰ · 3.0 ppm
Report
440590
Sample date
September 25, 2025 · 9:30 a.m.
Analysis completed
October 14, 2025
Report issued
October 15, 2025
Method
Cavity-Ring-Down Spectrometry (CRDS), relative to VSMOW

The Hydroisotop document directly reports 3.0 ppm for the identified sample and states that the results relate to the measured samples.

USGS Reston Stable Isotope Laboratory

Field ID 0004 · Lab ID W-191180

δ²H = −954.5‰
Results document
June 1, 2026
Field ID
0004
Lab ID
W-191180
Method/reporting
Hydrogen equilibration; δ²H relative to VSMOW
Stated uncertainty
2‰ at 2σ

The USGS document reports δ²H. It does not state a ppm concentration, so Mdrn-Life does not replace the laboratory's unit with an unsupported ppm number.

Why the numbers look different

Different reporting conventions should not be forced into one format

Isotope laboratories may report hydrogen-isotope measurements as δ²H relative to VSMOW. Some reports may also provide a consumer-readable ppm concentration. The two Mdrn-Life documents use different reporting details, and that difference should remain visible.

Transparency rule: show each laboratory result in the unit the laboratory actually reported. Do not create a ppm value where the report does not provide one unless a separate, clearly explained conversion methodology is being presented.

Three different statements

Production target versus measured sample result

5 ppm

Mdrn-Life production target. This is the intended isotope-composition specification for manufacturing.

3.0 ppm

Hydroisotop sample 0006. This is the measured concentration directly reported for that identified sample.

−954.5‰

USGS Field ID 0004. This is the δ²H result reported for that identified sample; no ppm value appears in the document.

These statements are related but not interchangeable. A production target describes what the process is designed to produce; a sample result describes what a particular laboratory measured in a particular submitted sample.

Evidence boundaries

What you can—and cannot—conclude from the reports

You can conclude

The reports provide independent analytical information about the water samples named in the documents. They show the sample identity, the laboratory's reporting method/convention and the values the laboratory issued for those samples.

You should not conclude

That every bottle or every batch has been independently tested, that both laboratories used the same analytical technology, or that an isotope measurement proves any health or treatment outcome.

Why publish the original PDFs?

The report should be inspectable, not reduced to a badge

A phrase such as “lab tested” tells a buyer very little by itself. The original documents let the reader inspect sample identifiers, dates, method/reporting language, values and uncertainty where provided.

That is also why Mdrn-Life separates scientific research from product isotope measurement. A biological study can investigate deuterium without proving the composition of a commercial bottle; a water-isotope report can verify a sample without proving a biological outcome.

Continue

See how the sample evidence fits the full system